http://aidindia.org/main/content/view/1347/1/
"AID did not file RTI Application
On 18th Nov 2010 a post was made on various RTI related mailing lists
claiming that "AID" obtained a list of certain RTI activists through
an RTI application to an Indian Consulate in the US.
Association for India's Development (AID) and its volunteers have not
filed any such RTI application nor requested such information.
AID is committed to the RTI as a tool to promote transparency and
accountability in democratic governance, and will continue to work
with our partners deepening democracy in India through the use of RTI.
To learn more about AID's work with RTI, please visit our RTI page at
www.aidindia.org.
If you have any questions, please contact AID volunteers: Arun Gopalan
garun1279@gmail.com (240-421-5510) or Somu Kumar somukumar@gmail.com
(703-728-8987)"
Sarbajit
On Nov 19, 11:35 pm, young cyber indians <cyberyo...@tightmail.com>
wrote:
> Dear friends
>
> The order of the CIC was not given in a decision. It is a letter from Chief
> Information Commissioner giving his approval to decision of the first
> appellate authority M.E.A directing CPIO of M.E.A to seek assistance of
> DG-IB to obtain information to provide to AID. The approval of CIC is given
> for purpose of 24(1) proviso. We were supposed to be given the information
> for human rights violation within 45 days, but IB took 115 days and CIC also
> took 87 days to give approval.
>
> AID have taken legal opinion from senior advocate. They have advised that
> information given to an applicant under section 6 of RTI by paying fee is
> different from the information disclosed by public authority suo moto under
> section 4 of RTI Act and cannot be circulated to the non- applicants or
> published in newspapers. They also referred to preamble of RTI Act which
> clarifies object of the RTI to be "Now, therefore, it is expedient to
> provide for furnishing certain information to citizens who desire to have
> it."
>
> Rajeshwar Rao
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Anil Agrawal <aad...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Decisions of the CIC are uploaded and are available in its website for all
> > to see, read and use. How it is an offence?
> > Anil
>
> > On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 12:23 PM, young cyber indians <
> > cyberyo...@tightmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> Dear friends
>
> >> I am very grateful to all the well wishers of RTI movement who have
> >> replied to my email either on the groups or on my email. I am unable to
> >> respond to each of you individually. I also believe that the information
> >> (lists) should come out in public domain. At the same time, the information
> >> was obtained for me by AID and they are also planning to file a case, pursue
> >> with the Government. I am also worried about my visa /passport if the govt
> >> takes any retaliatory measures against me or files case under the Official
> >> Secrets Act etc. for releasing the information
>
> >> I have therefore decided to follow advice of Sarbajit Royji and complain
> >> that govt is ignoring claims of eminent civilians from being appointed as
> >> Information Commissioners in transparent manner. An illustrative list of 10
> >> such eminent persons extracted from govt records is below.
>
> >> "muzaffar bhatt, kamla bhasin, avinash murkute, amit b. jethawa, saraswati
> >> kavula, shahana bhattacharya, somya kidambi, dr.binayak sen, venkatesh
> >> nayak, amrapali basumatary"
>
> >> best wishes to everyone
> >> K Rajeshwar Rao
>
> >> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:13 AM, Anil S <anilrepor...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>> hi mr rao, i would like to obtain some more details in this regard.
> >>> can i pls have your number? regards anil. anil s, sr reporter,
> >>> tnie, kochi
>
> -------------------------------------------------
> This message sent via VFEmail.nethttp://www.vfemail.net
> $14.95 Lifetime accounts - 1GB disk, No bandwidth quotas!
No comments:
Post a Comment